SEO Disparity - How Under qualified SEOs Get Jobs
Take a quick browse through leading SEO forums, SEOChat, SitePoint, and look in their ‘professionals’ or ‘for hire’ threads. You’ll notice that just about everyone, cousins, aunts, dogs, know how to provide SEO services at a ‘professional level’. In fact, SEO must be the most qualified industry in the world given the number of roaming professionals in the general population.
All jokes aside, how is it possible that 16 year old kids or SEOs without credentials win jobs? The answer is pretty simple, there is a market for low cost SEO. Let’s take a look at some issues that show how anybody can get a job in search engine optimization and what is to be done about the issue.
1. The training. There is no standard or 'test' required to be labelled an SEO. A handful of universities are starting to take notice of the phenomena, however, marketing and business majors have yet to realise the potential. This being the case, credentialing is difficult and non-existant. Existing methods to become ‘certified’ in SEO are generally from online institutions and lack the prestige, proper curriculum, and knowledge to providing top ‘grandaunts’.
As it currently stands, anybody who reads English is at an advantage over the remainder of the world. I’m not being biased here, merely suggesting that the majority of information and methods of learning some SEO traits are provided in English. This would account for the heavy influx of third-world SEOs popping up throughout the online land.
Because of the lack of credentialling SEO provides interesting dillemas (although not unique to the industry). Quality of life factors influence consultation prices. An SEO from India may be able to acquire large contracts because they have the ability to price their services lower given this factor. I’m not going to dwell on a quality of life argument, but rather, would support a more sound argument based on experience overall experience and integrity.
Hypothetically (and actually this is the case for the majority) someone can learn the current trends and the ‘ins and outs’ of SEO with enough accuracy to start ranking web sites successfully. Today, this is the primary method in joining the SEO foray. In fact, a couple of the major components of the real SEO ‘pro’ is staying current with the field and experience—what they have accomplished in the past. This brings me to my second point.
2. Successful SEO is largely based on following acceptable practices and methods. These methods/factors are numerous (innumerable by some measures), and constantly under debate. What we do know is lower competitive markets (your name, brown purple pony widgets, etc.) are easier to rank high, take less time, and are more ‘forgiven’ when it comes to leaving out certain SEO factors (either by ignorance or method), than a competitive market.
As a result, less astute SEOs can successfully rank these small websites. Furthermore, small websites are not interested in paying top dollar for the seasoned ‘pro’ and will gladly shell out a tenth of the cost for someone who claims the same results (the 'low-level' SEO). Herein lies a reason why the SEO industry requires differentiation (it’s starting) and how anybody can lay claim as a qualified SEO and profit from it.
3. If we're talking about what you can do to help your stay in the industry as an SEO, differentiation is key. Since there is no governing body for SEO the skill set of individuals will vary greatly. Many useful skills to posses as part of the SEO trade include marketing backgrounds, statistical backgrounds, understanding of coding languages like CSS, SQL, HTML, ASP, .net, etc. DistinctSEO posses these skills in addition to business strategy, CMS, content writing, the list could go on.
Matt Cutts recently posted a worthy blog encouraging SEOs to branch out and differentiate themselves in suitable niche markets. This is an excellent idea for new SEOs trying to capitalise in a market they have a suitable foundation in.
There is plenty of demand for SEOs; many markets, many consumers, many SEOs. A good movement would be for small/uncompetitive webmasters to learn SEO themselves and save themselves the trouble of hiring a 'low-level' SEO pro. This would weed out unqualified SEOs and leave those with substantial industry experience coupled with their unique skill sets to lay claim.
This unfairly assumes that quality SEOs can only be found in highly competitive markets, this is not the case. However, follow the old adage, "if you pay peanuts, you'll get monkeys." This is especially true in the SEO industry. A worthy investment is your online business, and some of the first indicators of the quality of service you're going to receive as a client may be in the consultation price. (Others include online portfolio and experience.)
Nonetheless, nothing can defeat creating suitable and lasting impressions in the SEO industry by maintaining a degree of integrity and results that no under qualified SEO can replicate. So differentiate yourself, continue learning, and hope nobody catches you falsely calling yourself 'pro'.

