<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting Bits about Long-Tail and Meta Keywords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/seo/interesting-bits-about-long-tail-and-meta-keywords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/seo/interesting-bits-about-long-tail-and-meta-keywords/</link>
	<description>Social media, web marketing, and SEO discussions to set your business apart.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry</title>
		<link>http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/seo/interesting-bits-about-long-tail-and-meta-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 19:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/seo/interesting-bits-about-long-tail-and-meta-keywords/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by and clarifying Eric. I would agree, however, would only suggest that keyword stuffing in the meta keyword tag would only get noticed if human eyes saw it, and even then, it&#039;d have to be pretty ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by and clarifying Eric. I would agree, however, would only suggest that keyword stuffing in the meta keyword tag would only get noticed if human eyes saw it, and even then, it'd have to be pretty ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Enge</title>
		<link>http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/seo/interesting-bits-about-long-tail-and-meta-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Enge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 17:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/seo/interesting-bits-about-long-tail-and-meta-keywords/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>For purposes of clarification, I think that the meta keywords are ignored by Google in general, but if you have 50 meta keywords in your meta keywords list, that it can be a negative signal (because it&#039;s keyword stuffing).

Other than that, I concur with the rest of the community that meta keywords are ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For purposes of clarification, I think that the meta keywords are ignored by Google in general, but if you have 50 meta keywords in your meta keywords list, that it can be a negative signal (because it's keyword stuffing).</p>
<p>Other than that, I concur with the rest of the community that meta keywords are ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
