<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shame on You Google &#8211; Adsense Thin Affiliates GALORE!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/web/shame-on-you-google-adsense-thin-affiliates-galore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/web/shame-on-you-google-adsense-thin-affiliates-galore/</link>
	<description>Social media, web marketing, and SEO discussions to set your business apart.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: custom tailor</title>
		<link>http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/web/shame-on-you-google-adsense-thin-affiliates-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>custom tailor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/web/shame-on-you-google-adsense-thin-affiliates-galore/#comment-631</guid>
		<description>i think NavyCS is right google should allow more than 200 Sites in the filter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think NavyCS is right google should allow more than 200 Sites in the filter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Css</title>
		<link>http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/web/shame-on-you-google-adsense-thin-affiliates-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Css</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 05:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/web/shame-on-you-google-adsense-thin-affiliates-galore/#comment-629</guid>
		<description>You know what&#039;s worse? When you take out these thin affiliates but they end up being some of the higher paying ads (they pay to be at the top) and your average click through value goes down even more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what's worse? When you take out these thin affiliates but they end up being some of the higher paying ads (they pay to be at the top) and your average click through value goes down even more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NavyCS</title>
		<link>http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/web/shame-on-you-google-adsense-thin-affiliates-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>NavyCS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.distinctseo.com/blog/web/shame-on-you-google-adsense-thin-affiliates-galore/#comment-627</guid>
		<description>It is a daily burden checking sites on the page and in the preview tool then adding the garbage to the filter. Google should allow more than 200 sites in the filter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a daily burden checking sites on the page and in the preview tool then adding the garbage to the filter. Google should allow more than 200 sites in the filter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
